| GM and Drought Tolerance - July 2008 | ||
| Home
|
Conclusion Marker
assisted breeding techniques can help plant breeders select drought
tolerance specimens for breeding. However, land management, such as
increasing the soil organic matter, is as important in buffering farmers
against the impacts of drought. Genetic
modification has so far not produced a commercial drought tolerant
variety in any type of crop. The genetic changes required involved
several genes to alter the plant’s physiology in a major way. Such
changes may have impacts on other plant functions, which could be
detrimental to the plant. It may take years to come up with a viable
GM solution, if it proves possible at all, and GM will not deal with the
challenges posed to farmers by climate change. Indeed, GM may divert
research and development funds away from more sustainable long-term
solutions based on good water and soil management and traditional plant
breeding. Introduction Others
involved in biotechnology have different opinions about progress in this
area of genetic engineering of crops. For example Professor Ossama El-Tayeb,
Professor Emeritus of Industrial Biotechnology at the University of
Cairo, seriously questions whether drought tolerance through genetic
manipulation will be achieved quicklyiv: "I wish to add that transgenicity for drought tolerance and
other environmental stresses (or, for that matter, biological nitrogen
fixation) are too complex to be attainable in the foreseeable future,
taking into consideration our extremely limited knowledge of biological
systems and how genetic/metabolic functions operate.. Those who propagate the ideas that any biological function could be
genetically manipulated are optimists who are probably victims of a
consortium of "arrogant" scientists and greedy business who
have strong control on policy making and the media.” Droughts
are not new. Climate change experts predict they could become more
severe:
The
impacts of droughts in Africa and Prolonged
lack of rainfall means that any plants will die and seeds simply will
not germinate. The unpredictable nature of seasonal weather adds to the
dilemmas facing the world’s farmers. Plants
naturally pump water from the soil and out through tiny openings on
their leaves called stomata by a process known as transpiration. These
openings also allow carbon dioxide to be taken in by plants. Some plants
have evolved to minimize water losses through transpiration, but they
tend to grow very slowly, eg cacti. A minority of plants, for example
sugar cane and maize, have evolved a different type of metabolism for
sugar production called Carbon 4 (or C4), whereas most plants have a
Carbon 3 (C3) metabolism. C4 metabolisms make better use of water than
C3 in hot arid zones. However C3 plants are more efficient in cooler
moister conditions. Biotechnology
industry spokespeople often give the impression that GM drought
resistant crops are a just round the corner. Drought
tolerance is likely to involve several genes controlling the passage of
water through normal plants, and is therefore proving much more
difficult and may throw up unexpected complications. Pumping water from
soil and out of the stomata on the leaves is what plants do naturally.
Most plants can withstand a certain amount of water stress if they have
a good root system, but this may limit growth or slow it. One proposed
GM approach is to close stomata. This may have an impact on the exchange
of vital gasses, ie carbon dioxide and oxygen, which enter the leave the
plant via open stomata. Both water and carbon dioxide are needed to
produce the sugars that plants need to grow and produce crops, and
therefore changes in stomatal opening could have significant
consequences for the biology of the plant. Another
possible way to genetically modify plants is to genetically engineer
their basic physiology by switching from a carbon 3 (C3) to a carbon 4
(C4) metabolism. C4 plants are able to keep photosynthesis going whilst
their stomata are closed thus saving water. Once
again this is a major physiological jump for plants, and there may well
be unforeseen consequences of such a change. Most crop plants and trees
are C3 plants, and a minority, including maize, sugar cane, millet and
sorghum, are C4. However despite this, maize and sugar cane (in dry
areas) around the world are already heavily dependent on irrigation to
produce a viable yield, showing that even a GM C4 plant would require a
significant input of water. Even
if genetic modification could overcome these profound difficulties,
which is far from clear, it would take years and come with a
considerable cost. Meanwhile other non-GM techniques and technologies
are available now, and they’re far cheaper. Minimising the Impact of Drought There
are many non-GM routes available to farmers now by which crops can be
assisted to survive and flourish in dry conditions. Increasing
Soil Organic matter Increasing
the organic matter content of the soil greatly increases the chances of
crops getting enough water to produce a harvest: “To minimize the impact of drought, soil needs to capture the
rainwater that falls on it, store as much of that water as possible for
future plant use, and allow for plant roots to penetrate and
proliferate. These conditions can be achieved through management of
organic matter, which can increase water storage by 16,000 gallons per
acre foot for each 1% organic matter. Organic matter also increases the
soil's ability to take in water during rainfall events, assuring that
more water will be stored. The
key is therefore to look after the soil as the first priority. This
means: Water
harvesting There
are several techniques for harvesting seasonal rainfallx to make it available for crops during dry seasons. For
example: Small-scale
check damns check the flow of water in river channels in periods of higher
rainfall to allow the water to seep into soils, recharging aquifers
below where it is stored until it is needed for irrigation. Check damns
also prevent soil erosion and allow fertile silts to accumulate. Small-scale
reservoirs for seasonal water storage can help conserve water for entire
communities. In Ploughing
along the contours of sloping land instead of across them reduces
run-off and soils erosion and allows rainfall time to percolate into
soil and aquifers. Micro
catchments can be constructed using vegetation to funnel rainfall into
storage pits for future use. Drip
or trickle irrigation systems are a water-efficient alternative to spray
irrigation in which water is delivered to plants in the correct amounts
close to their roots. This avoids massive water wastage from overhead
sprays due to evaporation in the air or from foliage and soil, blowing
off target, run off from soil surfaces or uneven application. One major
problem with drip irrigation systems is the cost of installation, which
usually means that it is only viable for high value crops. Agroforestry
is “a collective name for land-use systems and practices where woody
perennials are deliberately integrated with crops and/or animals on the
same land management unit”xi. In many areas of the world faced with environmental
extremes such as intermittent and unreliable rainfall it can provide a
more sustainable form of land management than large-scale crop
monocultures. Agroforestry
plantations can also protect water from contamination with chemicals or
eroded soils. Growing of annual and permanent crops can take place
between forested areas. As
noted above, water in the right amounts and quality is essential for
crop plants to flourish. Traditional plant breeders continue to develop
crops that do better in dry conditions. Essentially this means that they
can make better use of available moisture to go from seed to harvestable
crop before the water runs out. In “Early maturing varieties of these crops have proved especially
useful for helping dryland communities get through the ‘hungry season’. This is
the period beforeharvest, when the previous year’s grain supplies have
been exhausted. The millet variety ‘Okashana 1’, for example, which
was selected by farmers in Namibia and matures 4-6 weeks earlier than
traditional varieties, spread in just a few years during the mid-1990s
to cover half the country’s millet area. The US$3 million investment
required to develop and disseminate the variety was estimated in 1998 to
be yielding annual benefits worth $1.5 million. At about the same time
in southern Plant
breeders are now able to use molecular biology techniques to identify
genes conferring particularly characteristics in advance of crossing
plants, which cuts out the need for expensive and unreliable field
testing. Drought tolerance has been successfully incorporated into the
genome of hybrid pearl millet in this wayxvii. Growing
plants in the absence of water is impossible. Every plant requires a
certain amount of moisture to complete its cycle of growth to be point
it produces a viable yield for farmers. Traditional plant breeding has
produced varieties that already perform well in drier conditions, and
certain crops, such as millet and sorghum, have evolved in dry
conditions.
|